The Question about the Mossad agents…

The “Muslim Observer” Bendib asks one very important question about the assassination of the Palestinian Hamas official in Duba: How many Mossad agents does it take to assassinate ONE unarmed Palestinian?

Of course we could also ask, why the agents have to be flown in from all those countrys and with all those different passports and so on.. but when an affair stinks, it just stinks. You don’t really know, where the smell is coming from, but actually it doesn’t really matter. There is a rotten fish hidden somewhere and you won’t get the stink out unless you turned the whole location upside down.

Another thought: What would happen if Palestinians targeted an Israeli official in the same way? Say the Israeli education minister was staying at a hotel in a random country and because nobody really knows him internationally and nobody really cares for him, his guards aren’t on their heighest alert. A Palestinian group is able to get to him and kills him. What would that be called? What would not only international media but also all political faction be crying?

Terrorism

And that’s what i call an assassination. And this goes – there’s no question about it – for Germans, Americans and others murdering people in Afghanistan. Assassination has nothing to do with a justifiable war and it’s not even able to stop a war effectively. It’s mostly good to throw the opponent back in their strategy, but eventually more radical and bitter people would take the place of the assassinated one and the violence would continue. And we can’t shut our eyes to the justifiability of their radicality and their bitterness. They would have learnt, that their enemy is ruthless and knows no boundaries to achieving his political means. No more has to be said to this assassination.

Media circus

Oh one thing yet: The comment by Bendib is nicely placed. It reads: “Cowardice is our number one strength! We don’t do well in a fair fight: remember Lebanon?”. Beside the point of cowardice, i think it’s important to remember that the Israeli army and Israel as a country has suffered significantly in public relation carma due to their more-or-less loss in the Lebanon war 2006. Also the methods used by the Israeli army – bombing civilians and blaiming the opponents, invading without real grounds, etc.. – and the civilian victims due to those methods hasn’t reflected well on Israel and their army as a whole. Maybe the successfull (i use this word of course not meaning that the loss of a life could in any way described as ‘success’) assassination is a way for Israel to reestablish its credibility as killing machine??

Keine relevanten Beiträge.

Comments

  • By zionist juice, 16. März 2010 @ 15:11

    and how come everbody knows the mossad did it???
    yet nobody could prove that!

  • By Mittagsgruß, 17. März 2010 @ 11:33

    Der “Moslemische Beobachter” ? Nachtigall ich hör´dir trappsen.

  • By Omar, 17. März 2010 @ 11:37

    @zionist juice: voll am Thema vorbei!

    @Mittagsgruß: Fühlst du dich von einem “muslimischen Beobachter” bedroht?? Mal davon abgesehen, dass Observer in dem Fall eher “Betrachter” oder “Kommentator” heißen wird..

  • By zionist juice, 17. März 2010 @ 22:54

    ich finde halt, dass mit der hypothese was nicht stimmt…..
    es gibt keine beweise, kein bekennervideo, keine freudentaenze auf den strassen jerusalems usw

Other Links to this Post

RSS-Feed für Kommentare zu diesem Beitrag. TrackBack URI

Einen Kommentar schreiben